1991-1994 Mercury Capri XR2: The anti-Miata that failed

1991 Mercury Capri XR2

1991 Mercury Capri XR2 (Lincoln-Mercury photo, author archives) (click to enlarge)

I just goes to show you how things so similar can be so different. On the surface, the Mazda Miata—introduced in the fall of 1989—and the 1991 Mercury Capri are very similar: two seat sportsters powered by Mazda four-cylinder engines. Both had pop-up headlights, and crossed the Pacific to reach American buyers. How more similar could you make them?

Well, how about making them different? The Capri, for starters, was built in Australia. And while the Mazda came only with a 116 horsepower engine, the base Capri came with a 100-hp cooker, but offered a turbocharged and intercooled four that squeezed out 132 horses for a model designated XR2. In the 2545-lb car, it produced acceleration that was substantial. The little droptop could scamper the zero to 60 dash in only 7.9 seconds, more than a second quicker than the Miata, and faster than the Honda CRX Si as well. The Capri had a modern body, based on a mid-‘80s show car called the Barchetta, with a genuine Italian styling. By all rights, the XR2 should have swamped the Miata.

However, the Miata had something the Capri, base or XR2, didn’t: rear-wheel drive. The Capri was a front driver, putting 64 percent of its weight on its front wheels. And even in XR2 form, the suspension was soft. The Capri understeered. A lot. The chassis came almost directly from the mid-‘80s Mazda 323, and it handled more like an econobox than a sports car. The Miata smoked the XR2 on the skid pad, despite the Capri’s 185/60R14 Dunlops…or perhaps because of them. The Capri’s handling could also be spooky, showing an eagerness to swap ends at the slightest provocation. The Miata felt more solid, with less cowl shake. The four-wheel disc brakes on the XR2, a nice touch for this market, were biased to heavily to the front, however.

Admittedly, the Capri did have a few advantages over the Miata, such as a vestigial back seat, suitable for grocery bags, small children or someone you don’t like very much. It was cheaper, by about $1,700, than even the inexpensive Miata; the XR2 listed at $15,522. It was quite well equipped at that price, too, with power mirrors, locks and windows, air conditioning and cruise control, but the XR2’s standard aluminum wheels could have passed for full wheel covers. The Capri was a better turnpike cruiser, roomier, quieter, and with better directional stability that the comparatively nervous Miata. But then, almost any sedan could trump the Capri on these latter qualities.

One could have expected the Capri, if not to overwhelm the Miata, to at least develop a following of its own, either for tis power or as a convertible cruiser. That didn’t happen. Despite the lessons of the Merkur line, then a recent nightmare for Ford Motor Company, the Capri would fall victim to similar faults. Quality control was miserable. Owners had Capris fall apart under them. Even a press evaluation Capri we drove had a tie rod come adrift, giving the peculiar experience of one-wheel steering.

The Capri struggled with disappointing sales for tis first several years, and the 1994 model year, the front and rear styling was revised, complete with a different rear spoiler for the XR2, which also got firmer suspension. A passenger airbag was added, too. Needed improvements all, but they were too late. The Capri was missing from Lincoln-Mercury dealer showrooms for 1995. It wasn’t sporty enough for sports car enthusiast, for whom the Miata was the hands-down choice. And although blonde cheerleaders looked good driving a Capri, that’s a rather small market segment.